Some days are magical ! Tampa Bay, race 5, added to an already good day. The first thing I noticed is the top rated R2 horse is paying 7/1 and is going off at about a 100% premium in this Fishing Score 10 race. I quickly noticed that the top R2 score in the race was 4.0. Then I noticed that most of the R1 scores were in double digits. All of this makes for a VERY opportune horse race betting situation. Clearly, the public is very likely to be confused. Next, I am looking for any other good bets. I start with the other prime contenders, Horses 6, 10, 8 and 12. None of the four are going off at 7/1 or better so the are discounted for win bets. Horse 9, the top prime contender, is definitely a bet at 7/1. Horses 3 and 7 are the secondary contenders. Horse 3 has delicious IMP/LS scores of 2/4 and is paying a very slight premium at 9/1. Horse 3 warrants a bet. No9w we have to evaluate any other “live” overlays. Horse 7 is going off at 5/1 so is not considered further. Horse 11 is interesting because it is a “1/2″ = 5 horse. In addition, as covered in webinar 5, Horse 11 is ranked in two positive Key Factors. Even better, Horse 11 is paying about a 60% premium and going off at 50/1. That is a perfect scenario for a “1/2″=5 type of horse. So our three bets are Horses 9, 3 and 11. They are all very juicy odds. A $1 exacta and trifecta box is certainly warranted. Sit down for the good news. Horse 11 won and paid a whopping $109.20. Horse 9 ran second and paid $8.60 to place. Morse importantly, the exacta paid $923.20 for $2 boxing our three horses. Prime contenders ran second, third and fourth if you consider Horse 9. If you brought the prime contenders in to the mix then the trifecta paid $6928.40 for $2 and the super paid $20,132.60 for $2. I heard from so many subscribers who won this race I really believe that Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings subscribers took the bulk of the win pool. I know one subscriber who bet $100 to win on the 11. Think about it !!

On this Valentine’s Day I am in love with Gulfstream Park. Werbinar 5 was just held less than 48 hours ago and the value of RW and key factors was explored. Today, at Gulfstream Park, race 8, the point was driven home! Horse 4 was the top rated Key Factor 2 horse and going off at 45/1 as the worst rated R2 horse in the race. On top of that Horse 2 was going off at 2/5 in a Fishing Score 7 race. Quite a mixed bag to say the least. Only the brave venture out in this type of situation. However, this is EXACTLY the scenario that was covered in detail in Webinar 5. Horse 4 is paying a healthy 30% premium over the R1 score of 35.1 and the top rated Key Factor 2 horse. Even if you only bet $2 to win Horse 4 is clearly worth a bet. Yes, many such horses will lose, but some will win and they will always pay boxcars. Horse 4 paid $93.40 !! Not too hard to take !! Oh, by the way the 2/5 shot is still running.

Horse race betting is where you can fish for cash ! Today, February 9, 2014, saw a lot of strong horses running and winning at low odds. In order to win money a bettor had to wait and wait for good opportunities. Fishing score 10 races typically provide the type of opportunity necessary to win. Where would you rather fish (bet) ? Would you prefer a lake stocked with a few big fish and lots of little fish or a lake stocked with just as many big fish as little fish? A Fishing Score of 10 lets you know you are betting in a lake stocked with plenty of big fish. The first of the 3 examples is Calder race 5 where Horses 5 and 4 looked very good. However, the Fishing Score was 10 so you either want to pass the race or find a bomber to bet. Horse 7 was a secondary contender and a bet at 12/1. Horse 8 was going off at 8/1 which is far too low to bet when the R1 is 21.9 and the only sign of life is a score of 1 for IMP. Horse 6 is at about right odds of 20/1 with an R1 score of 26.1 and the infamous score of 5 for the “1/2″ rating. Horse 6 won and paid $43.40. The point is in a Fishing Score 10 race you want to make real money. $43.40 is real money! The second example race is Aqueduct 9 which is also a Fishing Score 10 race. Race 9 was so easy you can almost fall over. The second best R2 horse in the race, Horse 10, had a R1 score of 4.1 and was going off at 8/1 which is a 100% premium. What else is there to think about? Horse 10 won and paid $19.00 which is fabulous for the second choice!The final example is even more astounding! Race 9 at Fair Grounds was also a Fish Score 10 race. The top two choices both had negative R1 scores. However, Horse 9 was going off at 7/1 and was a bet. The next best horse, Horse 8, had a R1 score of 12.9 and was going off at an amazing 19/1 which is about a 50% premium. Horse 8 won and paid a beautiful $41.80 as the third best horse in the race according to R2! More real money ! Just remember to fish in the lakes where there are lost of big fish!

Horse race handicapping is too simple sometimes. People have a tendency to over think a race sometime. Take the 3rd at Calder on February 8, 2014. Horse 4 was the top R2 horse in the race with a respectable 3.1 score. Horse 4was the fourth best R1 score with 6.7 and actual odds of 10/1. Let’s briefly review. The horse projected to finish first in the race is paying about a 50% premium and is going off at better than 7/1. I call that an absolutely perfect opportunity to make a profit! Horse 4 won and paid $22.60 ! It can not possibly be any easier than that!! Just do not think too much!!

Horse race handicapping a small field can be profitable with Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings, especially when the favorite is horribly overbet! The 6th race at Beulah on February 4, 2014 is a perfect example. Horse 4 had a R1 score of -.4 which means the actual odds should have been about 1/1. However, Horse 4 went off at 2/5! Even though the race has a Fishing Score of 3 it is worth looking at since Horse 4 is contributing so much to the win pool. If Horse 4 fails to win there is a chance for a premium wager. Horse 4 is the only prime contender and cannot be bet. The secondary contender is Horse 5 which has a R1 score of 1.3 and actual odds of 7/2 which is not worth a bet. At this point it is advisable to look at any other horse who is “live” and paying a premium. Horses 2, 1 and 3 are left to evaluate in the 5 horse field. Only Horse 1 qualifies as “live” with an IMP/LS rating of 1/4. Horse 1 has a R1 score of 14.3 and actual odds of 20/1 which is about a 50% premium. There is always a question of whether you want to bet against a 2/5 shot. However, if you did decide to bet Horse 1 then you were rewarded with a $43.20 winner. That is how you handicap a small field.

Handicapping horses with Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings delivered huge boxcar payoffs ice cold today! If you review the 3 keys to handicapping you will realize just how easy and understandable they are. Handicapping key 1 is identify prime contenders. Handicapping key 2 is identify secondary and other “live” contenders. Handicapping key 3 is identify horses with actual post time odds paying a premium over the R1 score. That is it! Let’s apply the 3 handicapping keys to race 9 at Turfway Park today, February 2, 2014. There is only one prime contender which is Horse 5. The R1 score for Horse 5 is 2.3 and the actual odds are 3/1 so Horse 5 is paying a slight premium. However, Horse 5 odds are too low to bet to win. The secondary contenders are 7, 11, 2 and 10. Their respective R1 scores are 6.6, 6, 30.1 and 6.7. Do you see what I see ??? Their actual post time odds are 3/1, 9/2, 55/1 and 7/2. Now do you SEE what I see ??? Horse 2 has a R1 score five times higher than the other three horses and is still a secondary contender !!! On top of that Horse 2 is paying a premium of over 60% !!!!! I almost lost my sneakers running to the window to bet the 55/1 Horse 2 !!! Horse 2 won and paid $121.60 !!!!! OMG !!!!! Can you believe handicapping horses with Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings is really that easy ??? It REALLY is that easy !!!!! On top of that, Horse 5, the ONLY prime contender, ran second. The exacta paid $681.40 !!! Horse 7, another secondary contender ran third !!! The trifecta paid $3248.40 !!! All you need to have a tremendous score today was faith – faith in the Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings and the 3 keys to handicapping horse races !!! Just click on the link for this race and see for yourself.

Handicapping horse races and winning money is as easy as 1-2-3 with Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings when you follow the three easy keys stated above. Today was a perfect example. There were 12 day tracks, including California. Those tracks offered 112 races. Using the 3 horse race handicapping keys there were 50 races that could be reasonably bet in my humble opinion. 9 of those 50 races had very predictable winners using the Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings. That gives a win rate of 18%. The average mutuel for the 9 races was $23.20. That means if you bet $2 on each of the 50 races you would bet $100. For every $2 bet on the 9 winners you would have collected 208.80. The 9 winning races were Oaklawn race 4 (17.80), race 6 (15.40), race 8 (28.80), Parx race 4 (52.40), Santa Anita race 4 (21.60), Tampa Bay race 9 (26.80), race 11 (17.20), Turfway race 5 (13.00) and race 9 (15.80). I lost the other 41 races I bet. I did slightly better than double my bank today, even though I lost more than 4 out of every 5 races I bet. I have included the sheets for Oaklawn because Oaklawn was very profitable today.

Winter racing can be the pits. During the week few players go to the track so there is less chance of a juicy betting error by the public. Thank goodness for Tampa Bay Race 2 today! On the surface the race does not look noteworthy. The race has a Fishing Score of 6 with only seven horses. Especially during the winter I look closely at every race. I note this race is a maiden race which I love. There are three prime contenders in the race. They are Horses 4, 1 and 7. Their respective R1 scores are -8.9, -2.6 and 4.2. The actual odds are 5/2, 3/1 and 5/2. Even though Horses 4 and 1 are both paying a premium compared to their R1 scores the values are still too low to bet to win. There are no secondary contenders with a CS2 below 100. Next I look for any other horse who may be a “live” overlay. Horse 2 is next in line, but has no indication of being a “live” horse. Horse 6 is next in line on the sheet. Horse 6 has a great IMP/LS combination of 2/4 which I especially love in maiden races. Horse 6 has a R1 score of 15.1 and actual odds of 25/1. That is over a 60% premium. My kind of bet! Horse 6 won the race and paid $53.00 for every $2 bet to win. What a way to warm your wallet on a cold winter day!

Christmas came late at Gulfstream this year, but come it did! What a fabulous money making day for Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings Subscribers. The best part is there was nothing hard or tricky about getting the winners. Starting with race 2, Horse 8 was a prime contender with a D2 score below 1. Horse 8 had a R2 score of -.9 which means Horse 8 should have been going off at 1/1 or less. In reality Horse 8 went off at 7/1!! That is a premium of 600% !! OMG!! What an opportunity!! Horse 8 paid $16.00 to win to start a day of gifts.
Race 3 was similar. Horse 9 was a secondary contender with a CS2 score of 99. The R1 score was 9.6 and the actual odds were 13/1 which was a premium of almost 50%. Horse 9 was another gift as it returned $29.80 to win.
Race 4 was very similar to race 2. Horse 6 was a prime contender with a D2 score of .9. Horse 6 had a R1 of 11.6 and actual odds of 9/1 so Horse 6 was not paying a premium. However, Horse 6 also had the beautiful IMP/LS of 3/4 so was clearly worth a bet in the Fishing Score 10 race. Horse 6 was another gift in an afternoon of gifts returning $21.40.
The gifts just keep on coming with race 5. Horse 4 is a solid secondary contender with a CS2 score of 92 and a R1 of 7.2. The actual odds are 10/1 which is about a 30% premium. That is pretty good especially with the very nice IMP/LS scores of 2/4. This gift returned $23.80.
Race 6 was not playable with a strong favorite. Race 7 had another nice gift for us although there was no premium in sight. Horse 10 was another solid secondary contender with a Cs2 of 98. The Fishing Score was 10 so you really want to be as lenient as possible when picking double digit winners. Horse 10 was very marginal with low odds of only 8/1 and a R1 score of 22.2. The decision to bet Horse 10 was clearly a judgment call. If you bet Horse 10 then you collected $19.00 which is still not too shabby.
Did you notice a win rate of 5 for 11 at Gulfstream? All solid double digit winners? Merry Christmas a little late !

Day racing was tough today with so many favorites winning so many races. On a day like today you have to just wait for your opportunities and not get sucked in to too many losing bets. Today you definitely made money by passing a lot of races. Gulfstream was the bright light of the day.
Race 1 started the day off on a good foot. The prime contenders were 1, 3 and 4. Their respective R1 scores were .1, 2.8 and 2.4. Their actual post time odds were 1/1, 6/1 and 8/1 in this Fishing Score 7 race. At this point we have two bets. Horse 3 is just below the desired odds of 7/1, but that is acceptable when the Fishing Score is 7 and 6/1 is a clear overlay. Horse 3 won and paid $14.40 for a very easy pick up.
Race 2 was very similar. The prime contenders were 7, 4, 6 and 2. Their respective R1 scores were 2.7, .6, 1.8 and 10.1. Their respective odds were 5/1, 2/1, 9/2 and 11/1 in this Fishing Score 6 race. Again we are willing to accept slightly lower odds in the slightly lower Fishing Score race. The best overlay is Horse 7 which will pay a premium of about 100% with a R1 of 2.7 and actual odds of almost double that figure. That makes Horse 7 a definite bet. Horse 4 is an overlay, but will pay far too low to bet. Horse 6 is paying a premium of about 150%, but is a marginal bet at 9/2. Horse 2 is paying a slight premium of 10%. Horses 6 and 2 are judgment calls on whether to bet. Horse 7 won the race and paid an acceptable $12.80.
After a few passed races and a couple of losers we come to race 9. The prime contenders are 10, 11 6 and 8 after Horse 9 was scratched. Their respective R1 scores were 1.6, 6.1, 18.9 and 11.3. Their respective actual odds were 9/5, 3/1, 18/1 and 9/2. Does something stick out like a sore thumb? Did you notice the prime contender going off at 18/1 who is paying full value? OMG!! Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings subscribers were running to the window with this juice bet on a pretty slow day. Better yet, Horse 6 won and paid a day saving $38.80!! Horse 8 ran second and the exacta paid $262.60. Horse 10 ran third to complete a $780.80 trifecta. Boy, are the Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings good or what?

Today, January 13, 2014, there were only three tracks running. You still need to bring home the bacon when there are not very many betting opportunities. Today was no exception. Luckily the temperature was in the upper 50′s and Aqueduct did not cancel racing.
There was nothing exceptional today and very few betting opportunities. However, there were still a few opportunities that enabled us to bring home the bacon. Aqueduct, race 3, presented an easy opportunity. There were only two prime contenders. They were Horses 1 and 7. It is very important to note the Fishing Score was 3. Horse 1 had a R1 score of 1.1 and Horse 7 had a R1 score of 4.4. Horse 1 was going off at 4/5 and Horse 7 was going off at 6/1. Please remember in a Fishing Score 3 race it is very difficult to get a double digit winner. Therefore, it is more than acceptable to take a little less than the target odds of 7/1. Horse 7 is clearly a “live” longshot as the second choice in the race, a prime contender and going off at a premium on the R1 score. Horse 7 won and paid a very delicious $14.80 !! I can smell the bacon cooking now!
Race 4 at Aqueduct was another opportunity. Horses 4, 7 and 2 were the prime contenders. Their respective R1 scores were -4, 5.5 and 3.7. Their respective odds were 3/5, 7/1 and 7/2. A quick glance tells you there is a great opportunity with Horse 7. Horse 7 wins a pays a smoking $17.00. The bacon is really7 cooking now!
A very profitable day on a day with 26 races ! It really is that easy !

The Fishing Score of 10 combined with the R1 rule to score big time – again!! The 2nd at Oaklawn was a Fishing Score 10 race with a full field of 11 going to the post. This is exactly the kind of race you want to try and find a legitimate bet, if possible. Do not make unrealistic bets, but be alert for true opportunity.
There was only one prime contender in the race, Horse 8. For reasons unknown Horse 8 was going off at 6/1 with a R1 score of 3.5. However, Horse 8 is going off at odds too low to bet, especially in a Fishing Score 10 race. Horses 11, 2,9 and 7 are the secondary contenders. Horse 11 is the actual favorite in the race which helps to illustrate the confusion of the betting public. All four of the secondary horses are going off at odds of 5/1 or less and are, therefore, too low to bet. At this point we look for any other “live” longshot to bet. Horse 5 has a R1 score of 20.8, but is only going off at 9/1 which is far too low to bet in this particular situation. No one should be willing to accept a 50% discount in a Fishing Score 10 race. Horse 1 is next, but has absolutely nothing to suggest it is a “live” horse. Horse 3 has a TVP of 230 which qualifies Horse 3 as “live”. Horse 3 has a R1 of 41 and is going off at 15/1 which is far too low to accept. Horse 4 has the slimest qualifier with an IMP of 1 which is normally not enough to qualify a horse as “live”. However, in a Fishing Score 10 race leniency is the rule. Unfortunately, Horse 4 is going off at very low odds of 15/1n when compared to the R1 of 26.6. It is a judgment call, but in a Fishing Score 10 race you always try for a premium, if possible. Horse 10 has a CS2 of 122 which is definitely on the high side. Horse 10 also has a TVP of 117 which is nice, but nothing to write home about. However, 10 has a R1 score of 47.8 and is going off at 44/1 which is pretty darn close to the odds we want. It is another judgment call, but 44/1 is very tempting in a very confusing race. Horse 6 is a little weaker with a CS2 score of 127 and a R1 score of 35.1. Horse 6 does show some glimmer of hope with an IMP of 2 and Horse 6 has a “1/2″ score of 5 which is perfect. With odds of 40/1 Horse 6 is another judgment call. The good news is Horse 10 won the race at 44/1 and paid $90.40. The top 3 R2 horses ran 3-2-4. Need I say more?

What a great start at Aqueduct in the 1st race! Then they pulled the plug ! OMG!! I was forced to switch to Calder and thank the heavens! Here is how it went down.
Just how much money does one have to make in a day to call it a success? The 1st at Aqueduct was pretty easy. There were three prime contenders in the race. They were Horses 2,6 and 1 in a Fishing Score 7 race. Horse 2 was the favorite as expected and went off at 8/5. Horse 6 was 5/1 with a R1 score of 6.3 so the odds were on the low side and the odds were below the target of 7/1. Horse 1 was 3/1 and too low to bet. There were no secondary contenders. At this point the procedure is to look for other “live longshots. Horse 5 was the first horse to consider. Horse 5 had a very nice IMP/LS score of 3/2 so Horse 5 was clearly “live”. Horse 5 had a R1 score of 15.2 and was going off at 10/1 which is on the low side, but was still in double digits and well above the target of 7/1. In addition to the nice IMP/LS scores for Horse 5 the best R2 in the race was only 3.2, While it is a judgment call, Horse 5 is generally attractive as a bet. Horse 5 won and paid a decent $22.00. to win. A very nice start to the day! Then the Aqueduct management team remembered it was winter and cancelled the rest of the card. Boo hoo!
I switched to Calder for the second race which was another Fishing Score 7 race. That means an average chance of a double digit winner. The first thing you notice on the tote board is that ugly Horse 7 as a heavy favorite. The R1 for Horse 7 is -5.5 so we expect very heavy betting. However, the R2 is on 2.8 which is pretty high for a big favorite. That spells OPPORTUNITY. Now we have to find that opportune horse if there is one. It is also unusual that there are two other prime contenders with Horses 4 and 1. When you have such a heavy favorite you expect no other prime contenders. That spells OPPORTUNITY again. Horse 4 is going off at 7/2 with a R1 of 3.3 so that is not the opportunity horse. Horse 1 is going off at 5/1 with a R1 of 14 so that is not the opportunity horse either. There is one secondary contender in Horse 2 with a R1 of 10.7 and actual odds of 10/1 so that is a bet. Now to see if there is another opportunity horse. Horse 6 is the next horse in line and just missed being a secondary contender. Horse 6 has the slightest recommendation for being a “live” horse, but is the top ranked Key Factor 2 Horse. That makes it worth looking at R1. I almost fall over when I see R1 is 13.2 and the actual odds are 35/1. Like Pavlov’s dog, I start to salivate. Horse 6 is paying a premium of almost 200% !!! OMG !!! That is what I call opportunity !!! Horse 6 wins and pays $72.20 !!! I wish they would cancel Aqueduct more often !!!

Fishing Score 10 races are the best! Look at Laurel race 5 today, January 8, 2014. The Fishing Score was 10 which means we are looking for a bomber, if we can find one. A primary idea behind the Fishing Score is to very easily identify races where the public is very likely to be confused. Remember, when the public is confused we use the Winnermetrics Algorithm Ratings to see through the confusion. Race 5 is one of those races. As a starting point just remember that in a Fishing Score 10 race we really want a horse paying no less than 7/1. That is the whole idea of the ratings. Looking at the sheet from top to bottom we see that Horses 6, 4, 3 and 8 are all well below 7/1 and warrant no further consideration. If they beat us then they beat us. We cannot win every race. We continue or search for a mistake. Horse 5 is next going from top to bottom. Horse 5 has a R1 of 17.8 and actual odds of 14/1 which is very close to R1 and well above our target of 7/1. In addition, Horse 5 is clearly live with an IMP/LS score of 5/2. Absolutely a bet on Horse 5. That is the end of the analysis of prime and secondary contenders. Now we look for other “live” longshots, especially since it is a Fishing Score 10 race with only 1 bet so far. Horse 7 is the next horse to consider with a CS2 score of an acceptable 105. Horse 7 does have the most minimal sign of life with an IMP of 1. However, look at R1! Horse 7 has a R1 score of 18 and actual odds of 27/1. The public has made a very clear mistake on the value of Horse 7 and undervalued Horse 7 by about 50%. That makes Horse 7 a definite bet. This is exactly what we are looking for in Fishing Score 10 races. There were no other “live” longshots in the race. There were 3 more horses with “live” status because of TVP, but they were all overvalued and not deserving of a bet. Horse 7 won the race and paid a sumptuous $57.20 for every $2 bet to win. Now you see the very clear value of the Fishing Score!
Some days the favorites just keep coming. Today, January 4, 2014, was one of those days! However, all was not lost. There were some double digit winners that were pretty easy spread over most tracks. That is not what was important today. The lesson today was the “1/2″ ratings! The rating itself is very complicated and not worth explaining. The only thing to really know is when the “1/2″ score is EXACTLY 5 then give some thought to betting the horse, but only if it is long. The “1/2″ rating is ONLY for longshots. Today there were several bombers spread across most of the tracks. Many of the bombers today paid in the $40s, $50s and even $70s. Almost every single one of the bombers that won today had a “1/2″ score of 5. It is an oddity of the algorithms that just makes money. Don’t ever forget the “1/2″ rating.

Let’s take a look at the whole card at Laurel today. The first three races were won by one of the two top R2 horses with prices worthy of a top R2 horse. Race 4 presented the first real opportunity of the day. In a fairly small field it can be hard to find opportunity. Horse 1 certainly looks every bit the part of a monster. Where have we seen this before? Where do we frequently see an apparent monster? Where do we regularly see supposed monsters lose? The answer is maiden races. If there was ever an opportunity to bet against a monster it is in maiden races. Let’s take a closer look at the race. Keep in mind that if we are going to take a shot against a maiden it better be with a bomber that makes sense. There are no other prime contenders in the race other than Horse 1. The secondary contenders are Horses 5, 2 and 4. Their respective R1 scores are 9.8, 2.2 and 8.8. Their respective odds are 8/1, 4/1 and 5/1. Only Horse 5 comes close to being worth a bet. At this point we have to look at the other horses to see if anyone looks “live”. Therefore, we look at all other horses with a CS2 of 120 or less. That leaves only Horse 6 which is going off at 6/1. With a R1 of 9.1 Horse 6 does make any sense to bet. At this point you either pass the race or look to the weakest CS2 horses in the race. That is a decision left to your judgment. If you decide to look at the two remaining horses, Horses 7 and 3, you see something interesting. Both horses have very nice IMP/LS ratings and both horses are going off at odds very close to their R1 ratings. It is a judgment call, but just remember this is a maiden race. If you decided to make the best then you collected $40.20 on Horse 7.
Let’s move on to race 5. Race 5 was pretty simple. Horses 7, 1A and 6 were the prime contenders after Horse 1 was scratched. Their respective odds were 5/2, 5/2 and 9/1. Their respective R1 scores were 3.2, 4.8 and 7.5. If there is any doubt whatsoever about what to do in this situation please send me a contact email so we can clear it up immediately. Horse 6 paid a very generous $21.60. The three prime contenders ran 1-2-3. The exacta paid $124.80 and the trifecta paid $413.00. Could it possibly be any easier?
Race 6 was very similar to race 4 in every respect except it was a claiming race. The analysis is the same. Horse 6 was a strong IMP/LS horse in an otherwise mediocre race. Betting Horse 6 was strictly a judgment call, but could easily have been bet. Horse 6 won and paid $23.60.
Race 7 was won by the top R2 horse which paid an excellent $11.60 to win. Race 8 was won by the top R2 horse which paid $7.40. Race 9 was a loser.
In summary, 5 of the 9 races were won by one of the top two R2 horses in the race. One of those 5 winners paid in the double digits. Three of the remaining races were won by “live” horses at or above their R1 score. They paid $40.20, $21.60 and $23.60. The last race was a loser. Do you believe in WInnermetrics Algorithm Ratings?